Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rebecca Munk Mortensen vs Sandugash Kenzhibayeva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mortensen vs Kenzhibayeva analysis and find out who is favored!
Rebecca Munk Mortensen vs Sandugash Kenzhibayeva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mortensen 1 - 0 Kenzhibayeva
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mortensen has won 47.28% of points on their second serve, while Kenzhibayeva has won 38.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mortensen, in recent form, has won 59.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kenzhibayeva has won 54.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.67% and 41.69% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mortensen has saved 58.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kenzhibayeva has saved 50.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mortensen has won 70.37% of matches played (W/L 38/ 16), with Kenzhibayeva winning 63.64% (W/L 28/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mortensen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 32/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Kenzhibayeva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Mortensen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 21/ 11), where as Kenzhibayeva has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.42% of matches (W/L 26/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mortensen winning 1 times and Kenzhibayeva being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mortensen winning 2 and Kenzhibayeva winning 0. The last match between Mortensen and Kenzhibayeva was at the W25 Sharm ElSheikh, 23-10-2023, Q2 round, Hard with Rebecca Munk Mortensen getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mortensen and Kenzhibayeva have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mortensen winning 0 times and Kenzhibayeva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mortensen winning 0, and Kenzhibayeva 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mortensen has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.09 while Kenzhibayeva has played against players with an average rank of 63.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mortensen has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kenzhibayeva has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mortensen has converted 60.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kenzhibayeva has converted 50.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
591
Rank
591
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
65% (53-29)
Career Total W/L
52% (32-30)
77% (20-6)
YTD W/L
58% (7-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mortensen VS Kenzhibayeva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Rebecca Munk Mortensen | Sandugash Kenzhibayeva |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:0 | 1:48:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (53/83) | 54% (37/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (33/53) | 62% (23/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 38% (12/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 20% (3/15) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (34/69) | 43% (36/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mortensen VS Kenzhibayeva H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
3
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rebecca Munk Mortensen | Sandugash Kenzhibayeva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 77% (20/6) | 58% (7/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 74% (43/15) | 58% (15/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 61% (310/198) | 50% (121/119) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 83% (15/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 49 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 101 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:36 | 1:28:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 125.69 | 99.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (923/1585) | 59% (446/752) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (590/923) | 59% (263/446) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (313/662) | 40% (123/306) |
| BPs Won% Total | 60% (120/199) | 52% (45/86) |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (739/1457) | 47% (314/662) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (11/3) | 58% (7/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (20/25) | 58% (7/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 20% (5/1) |
Rebecca Munk Mortensen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Gabriela Vilar
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ganz
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
4 of
25)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Louise Brunskog
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 4-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Jana Otzipka
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
14
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Ines Faltinger
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
51%
(
46 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
50%
(
2 of
4)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
0%
(
0 of
2)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
2
Total Points Won
6
|
0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Ivana Sebestova
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Marie Dittmann
Player
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
51%
(
35 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felitsata Dorofeeva-Rybas
Player
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
87%
(
53 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
31 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aya El Aouni
Player
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
Player
Aruzhan Sagandikova
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
Player
Milana Safiullina
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gozal Ainitdinova
Player
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Irina Balus
Player
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
1-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
Player
Saumya Vig
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Mortensen Vs Kenzhibayeva Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mortensen are available here and Kenzhibayeva photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
